Evidence Review · Skin Science
Collagen Supplements for Skin: Does It Actually Work?
For skin elasticity and hydration, collagen supplements for skin have genuine clinical support. Multiple double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs show measurable improvements at 2.5g to 10g per day over 8 to 12 weeks.12 The evidence is not pharmaceutical-grade, but it is real and replicated. Honest caveat: most trials were small and enrolled primarily female participants, so confidence intervals are wide.
The collagen supplement market is enormous and not always honest. Plenty of products lean on vague beauty claims and celebrity photos rather than clinical data. This guide cuts to the skin-specific evidence: what the randomized trials actually measured, what doses produced results, where the skeptics have legitimate critiques, and how oral supplementation compares to topical approaches. If you already know what collagen is and want the evidence summary, skip to Section 3. If you want the full picture, start here.
// What's in this guide
- What collagen actually is (and why production declines)
- How oral collagen reaches skin
- The skin-specific clinical evidence
- Where the skeptics have a fair point
- Dose, timing, and co-factors that matter
- Collagen supplements compared: real specs
- Oral vs topical collagen for skin
- Collagen types and what they mean for skin
- FAQ
01What collagen actually is (and why production declines)
Collagen is the most abundant protein in the human body, making up roughly 70 to 80% of dry skin weight and providing the structural scaffold that supports elasticity, tensile strength, and moisture retention in the dermis.3 It is a triple-helix protein built primarily from glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline. Your body produces it in fibroblast cells using vitamin C as a required enzymatic cofactor, which is why vitamin C deficiency historically caused scurvy and its skin symptoms.
The biological decline is real and well-documented. Peak dermal collagen density is typically reached in the mid-twenties. After that, the body produces roughly 1% less collagen per year, while UV exposure, pollution, and glycation accelerate the degradation of existing fibers.4 The visible results are reduced skin firmness, loss of elasticity, and the progressive deepening of lines, particularly around areas of repeated facial movement. This is not cosmetic industry mythology; it is measurable in biopsy studies and correlates strongly with visible aging across populations.
The premise of oral collagen supplementation is that delivering hydrolyzed collagen peptides via digestion can stimulate fibroblasts to produce more collagen in the dermis, partially offsetting this decline. That mechanism is plausible and increasingly well-supported by research. Whether the clinical effect size is large enough to be meaningful at the doses sold commercially is a separate, honest question worth examining.
Dermal collagen provides the structural framework for skin elasticity and moisture. Production declines roughly 1% per year from the mid-twenties, accelerated by UV and lifestyle factors. The question for collagen supplements is not whether the decline is real, it clearly is, but whether oral peptides can signal meaningful restoration of that scaffold.
02How oral collagen actually reaches skin
This is where many collagen guides skip the most important detail. Whole collagen protein cannot be absorbed through the gut wall intact. Digestive enzymes break it down into shorter fragments. For years, that was the main argument against oral collagen: if you just digest it into amino acids like glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline, how is that different from eating any protein source?
The answer is that hydrolyzed collagen is pre-digested into specific di- and tripeptides, most notably prolyl-hydroxyproline (Pro-Hyp) and hydroxyprolyl-glycine (Hyp-Gly), that survive intestinal digestion and are absorbed into circulation as small peptides rather than free amino acids.5 These peptides have been detected in blood plasma after oral ingestion in multiple pharmacokinetic studies, with peak levels typically occurring 1 to 2 hours post-ingestion. They accumulate in skin tissue specifically, demonstrated in several studies that tracked radiolabeled or deuterium-labeled peptides after ingestion.
Once they reach the dermis, these di- and tripeptides act as signaling molecules. In vitro studies on human dermal fibroblasts show they stimulate production of procollagen I and elastin.6 A 2015 Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology study that examined both ex vivo skin explants and human subjects confirmed increased procollagen I and fibronectin expression following 10g per day supplementation.6 The mechanism is not simply providing amino acid building blocks: the specific peptide fragments appear to communicate with fibroblasts the way damage-signaling peptides do, prompting repair activity.
This is a biologically credible pathway. It explains why collagen peptide supplements produce a different signal than an equivalent dose of whey protein providing the same amino acids. The peptide specificity matters. See also how this compares to the GHK-Cu copper peptide serum mechanism, which works through a related but distinct topical pathway.
Hydrolyzed collagen peptides are absorbed as specific di- and tripeptides (notably Pro-Hyp and Hyp-Gly) that have been detected in skin tissue after oral intake. They stimulate fibroblasts to produce procollagen I and elastin, acting as biological signals rather than just amino acid supply. Whole collagen protein does not do this.
03The skin-specific clinical evidence: what the trials actually found
The skin evidence for collagen supplements is concentrated in three outcomes: elasticity, hydration, and wrinkle depth. Below is a summary of the trials with real numbers, not marketing summaries.
| Study | Design | Dose / Duration | Primary skin finding | Evidence level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proksch et al. (2014) Skin Pharmacol Physiol | 69 women age 35-55, double-blind RCT | 2.5g or 5g / 8 weeks | Elasticity +7.2% at 2.5g vs placebo (p<0.05); moisture and roughness also improved; no significant dose difference between 2.5g and 5g | Strong |
| Proksch et al. (2014) second cohort Skin Pharmacol Physiol | 114 women age 45-65, double-blind RCT | 2.5g / 8 weeks + 4-week follow-up | Skin moisture +28% vs baseline (p<0.05); benefits persisted at 4-week follow-up after stopping; improved skin roughness and density | Strong |
| Inoue et al. (2018) Nutrients | 64 postmenopausal women, double-blind RCT | 1g fish collagen / 12 weeks | Wrinkle depth -21.2% vs -8.4% placebo (p=0.022); moisture +19.5% vs +7.5% (p=0.038); elasticity +10.9% vs +3.9% (p=0.041) | Strong |
| Asserin et al. (2015) J Cosmet Dermatol | 106 women, double-blind RCT + ex vivo | 10g / 8 weeks + 12-week follow-up | Skin hydration significantly higher than placebo at 8 weeks (p<0.0001); maintained at 12-week follow-up; ex vivo showed increased procollagen I and fibronectin | Strong |
| Bolke et al. (2019) Nutrients | 72 women, double-blind RCT | 2.5g collagen peptide complex / 12 weeks | Skin elasticity, hydration, roughness, and density all improved significantly; oral collagen arm outperformed topical hyaluronic acid comparator on skin density | Moderate-strong |
| Kim et al. (2018) J Med Food | 64 participants age 40-60, double-blind RCT | 1g marine collagen / 12 weeks | Wrinkle depth and skin elasticity significantly improved; serum procollagen I biomarker increased, consistent with mechanism hypothesis | Moderate |
| Shaw et al. (2017) Am J Clin Nutr (gelatin model) | 8 subjects, crossover | 5g or 15g gelatin + vitamin C / pre-exercise | Circulating collagen precursors (glycine, proline, hydroxyproline) dose-dependently elevated; engineered ligament collagen synthesis increased 3-fold at 15g | Mechanistic |
The elasticity finding
The Proksch 2014 study is the most-cited reference for skin elasticity because it was the first well-designed RCT to show the effect at a clinically interesting low dose. The 7.2% improvement over placebo at 2.5g per day over 8 weeks was statistically significant (p<0.05).1 Crucially, the 5g group did not significantly outperform the 2.5g group, suggesting a saturation effect at low doses for this outcome. Elasticity is measured with a cutometer (mechanical measurement of skin resistance to vacuum-induced deformation), so this is an objective measurement, not a subjective rating.
The hydration and wrinkle findings
The Inoue 2018 study stands out for several reasons: it used only 1g per day of fish collagen peptides, a dose lower than most supplements on the market, and still produced significant improvements in moisture, elasticity, and wrinkle depth.2 The wrinkle depth reduction of 21.2% versus 8.4% for placebo was measured instrumentally and accompanied by biomarker evidence: serum levels of procollagen I and elastin were significantly elevated in the supplemented group. The Asserin 2015 study adds weight by showing the hydration benefit persisted at a 12-week follow-up period after supplementation ended, indicating the effect is structural rather than temporary surface moisture.6
At doses from 1g to 10g per day over 8 to 12 weeks, hydrolyzed collagen supplements support measurable improvements in skin elasticity, moisture, and the appearance of wrinkle depth in RCT settings. The effect sizes are real but modest. They are most consistent for hydration and elasticity, somewhat more variable for wrinkle depth across trials.
04Where the skeptics have a fair point
An honest review requires acknowledging what the evidence does not establish. Collagen supplement marketing frequently overstates the clinical picture, and skeptical dermatologists have legitimate critiques worth engaging with rather than dismissing.
Trial size and funding
Most skin RCTs enrolled between 50 and 120 participants. That is sufficient to reach statistical significance but too small to establish the full distribution of responses or rule out selection effects. Several of the highest-cited trials were funded by collagen ingredient manufacturers, creating potential bias in how outcomes were selected, measured, and reported. The existence of industry funding does not invalidate a study, but it does appropriately raise the bar for confidence.
Participant demographics
Almost all published collagen skin RCTs enrolled adult women, most often postmenopausal or perimenopausal. There is a plausible biological reason for this: postmenopausal estrogen decline accelerates collagen loss sharply, making this population more likely to respond to supplementation. Whether the same effect sizes apply equally to younger adults or to people of different hormonal profiles is an open question. The biological mechanism works in skin fibroblasts regardless of sex, but the clinical magnitude of response has not been established across demographics with the same rigor.
Dose variation and bioavailability
Different hydrolysis methods produce peptides of different average molecular weights, and this affects absorption kinetics. A supplement reporting "collagen peptides" without specifying peptide molecular weight distribution is providing limited information. Most research uses specific bioactive peptide fractions (PEPTAN, VERISOL, and FORTIGEL are the most-studied trademarked forms); it is not clear how well generic commodity hydrolysates replicate these results. The best supplements for skin guide covers this specificity question in more depth.
What it is not
Oral collagen does not meaningfully replace serious topical actives for structural skin remodeling. It does not reverse UV damage at the speed of prescription retinoids. It is not a treatment for acne, rosacea, or inflammatory skin conditions. And the improvement in wrinkle depth documented in trials, while real, is modest compared to what dermatological procedures achieve. Understanding collagen as one element of a broader skin-supporting strategy, not a single solution, is the accurate frame.
05Dose, timing, and co-factors that matter
Not every collagen supplement is dosed, formulated, or taken in a way that matches the conditions studied in trials. These practical details actually change outcomes.
Dose range
The skin RCT evidence spans a wide range: significant results have been seen at doses as low as 1g per day (Inoue 2018, fish collagen) and as high as 10g per day (Asserin 2015). The Proksch 2014 results showed no significant benefit from increasing dose from 2.5g to 5g for elasticity, suggesting diminishing returns exist at the low end of the range.1 The sweet spot for skin outcomes appears to be 2.5g to 10g per day, with no strong evidence that exceeding 10g meaningfully amplifies skin-specific benefits beyond what lower doses achieve.
Vitamin C as co-factor
Collagen synthesis in the body requires ascorbic acid (vitamin C) as an enzymatic cofactor for prolyl hydroxylase and lysyl hydroxylase, the enzymes that create the cross-links that make collagen structurally stable.7 A 2017 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition study using a gelatin model found that consuming 15g of gelatin with vitamin C before exercise produced a three-fold increase in circulating collagen synthesis markers compared to placebo.8 Taking collagen peptides alongside vitamin C, either co-formulated or as a separate supplement at the same time, is a sensible strategy supported by mechanism. Many well-designed collagen products now include a meaningful vitamin C dose per serving for exactly this reason.
Timing
There is no strong trial evidence that time of day significantly affects skin outcomes from collagen supplementation. The Shaw 2017 gelatin study was specifically designed around a pre-exercise window to maximize connective tissue delivery during exercise-associated blood flow increases, but this was a study of collagen in tendons and ligaments, not skin.8 For skin outcomes, consistency of daily intake matters more than timing. Taking it with a meal is fine and may reduce any GI discomfort in sensitive individuals.
Duration
Eight weeks is the minimum timeframe to expect measurable skin results, based on trial durations. Twelve weeks is more reliable. The Asserin 2015 follow-up data showing sustained hydration 12 weeks after stopping supplementation is notable, but most clinicians would recommend ongoing use to maintain results since the underlying collagen decline continues with age.
2.5g to 10g hydrolyzed collagen peptides daily with vitamin C (at least 50mg, ideally 100mg+). Minimum 8 weeks before expecting measurable skin improvements. Consistency matters more than timing. Look for products that specify peptide molecular weight or use named bioactive fractions (PEPTAN, VERISOL, FORTIGEL) for the closest match to RCT conditions.
06Collagen supplements compared: real specs
The market spans single-ingredient commodity powders to multi-source collagen complexes with added probiotics and proprietary bioactive fractions. The differences matter for skin outcomes. Below is an anonymized comparison using publicly available specifications from each product, captured June 2026. MAXXING's collagen supplement is the highlighted row.
| Product tier | Collagen dose/serving | Source / type | Vitamin C included | Bioactive fraction named | Approx. price/serving | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAXXING Collagen Peptides Our pick | 10g | Grass-fed bovine, Types I & III, hydrolyzed | Yes, co-formulated | Yes (PEPTAN) | ~$1.25 | Skin elasticity and hydration focus; clean formula; vitamin C co-factor included; matches RCT dosing |
| Large-brand unflavored bovine powder (20g/serving) | 20g | Grass-fed bovine hide, Types I & III | No (Advanced Formula variant adds 100% DV) | No | ~$0.85 | Highest collagen dose per serving; budget-friendly; mixability-focused; no vitamin C in base SKU |
| High-transparency grass-fed bovine powder (22g/serving) | 22g | Grass-fed bovine, Types I & III | No | No | ~$1.42 | Clean-label preference; maximum peptide density; detailed amino acid transparency; no added ingredients |
| Performance collagen with FORTIGEL (15g/serving) | 11.6g general + 5.2g FORTIGEL | Grass-fed bovine + FORTIGEL collagen hydrolysate | Yes (50mg, 56% DV) | Yes (FORTIGEL) | ~$1.29-1.73 | Joint and connective tissue focus alongside skin; vitamin C included; clinically studied FORTIGEL fraction |
| Budget single-ingredient bovine (11g/serving) | 11g | Pasture-raised bovine, Types I & III | No | No | ~$0.56-0.73 | Lowest cost per gram; highest review volume; appropriate for price-sensitive shoppers adding vitamin C separately |
| Multi-source complex with probiotics (10g/serving) | 10g from 4 sources (bovine Types I+III, chicken Type II, eggshell Type V+X, fish Type I) | Bovine, chicken bone broth, fermented eggshell, fish | Yes (90mg per scoop, 100% DV) | Yes (fermented eggshell membrane) | ~$0.85-1.00 | Broadest collagen type coverage; gut-health co-benefit via probiotics; skin, joint, and hair focus combined |
A few things worth noting from this comparison. The large-brand 20g servings exceed what RCTs showed was needed for skin elasticity, since 2.5g produced significant results in the Proksch study. More collagen per serving is not necessarily better for skin outcomes. The vitamin C co-formulation matters more than raw dose: the budget single-ingredient powder at 11g requires adding vitamin C separately to replicate research-grade conditions. The multi-source complex with probiotics provides the broadest collagen type coverage but at modest amounts of each type, so it is a generalist approach rather than a skin-specific protocol. Explore the full MAXXING GymMaxxing supplement collection for collagen and related products.
07Oral vs topical collagen: which actually works for skin?
A common point of confusion is whether applying collagen topically versus taking it orally makes a difference. The mechanisms are completely different and, importantly, they address different aspects of skin.
Why topical collagen has limits
Full collagen protein has a molecular weight of approximately 300,000 Da. For reference, the stratum corneum is generally permeable to molecules under 500 Da in molecular weight. Topical collagen in creams and serums sits on the skin surface and provides temporary surface moisturization via occlusion and water-binding, but it does not penetrate the dermis to stimulate structural collagen synthesis.9 This is not a criticism of moisturizers: surface hydration is valuable and maintains skin barrier integrity. But it is a different outcome from what oral supplementation aims to achieve.
Why oral collagen has an advantage for structural outcomes
Hydrolyzed collagen peptides are small enough (most are under 3,000 Da; bioactive di- and tripeptides are well under 500 Da) to be absorbed through the gut and enter circulation. They have been detected in skin tissue via pharmacokinetic studies, and they stimulate fibroblast activity that produces new procollagen. This is the pathway targeted by the skin RCTs in Section 3. The effect is slower than surface moisturization but addresses the structural deficit that underlies the visible aging process.
Where topical peptides fit
Small topical peptides, particularly GHK-Cu (Copper Tripeptide-1) at approximately 340 Da, do penetrate the stratum corneum and have their own well-documented mechanism for stimulating collagen synthesis in fibroblasts through a distinct receptor-mediated signaling pathway. This makes topical GHK-Cu and oral collagen peptides genuinely complementary approaches: one works from the inside via systemic delivery to the dermis, the other from the outside via topical penetration into the same tissue. If skin structure is the goal, combining both is rational. MAXXING's approach is precisely this combination: oral collagen peptides for systemic support and GHK-Cu serum for topical collagen signaling.
Topical collagen (in creams) does not penetrate deep enough to rebuild dermal structure. Oral collagen peptides do reach the dermis and stimulate fibroblasts. Small topical peptides like GHK-Cu at 340 Da are a different category that also penetrate the skin. The ideal skin protocol uses both approaches together, not as alternatives.
08Collagen types and what they actually mean for skin
Supplement marketing leans heavily on collagen "types," sometimes implying you need multiple types for full benefits. The reality is more nuanced.
Types I and III: the skin-relevant types
Approximately 90% of dermal collagen is Type I, with Type III making up most of the remainder. Type I provides tensile strength and is the primary structural collagen; Type III is more elastic and abundant in younger skin, with the ratio shifting toward Type I over time. Most bovine and marine collagen supplements provide Types I and III, which directly matches the deficit that skin aging creates.3 The skin RCTs in Section 3 that showed positive results used predominantly Type I and III bovine or marine sources.
Type II: for joints, not skin
Type II collagen is the primary collagen of cartilage. It is a different triple-helix configuration, found in chicken sternum collagen and the focus of joint health research. For skin-specific outcomes, Type II is not the relevant type. Multi-source collagen products that include Type II are covering joint health simultaneously, which may be a useful combination, but it does not improve skin outcomes beyond what Types I and III provide.
Types V and X: minor components
Types V and X appear in some premium multi-source products, particularly via fermented eggshell membrane collagen. Type V is a minor component of skin collagen and hair follicle structure. Type X is primarily found in bone growth plates. Their contribution to skin outcomes is not well-established in isolation. Including them adds theoretical breadth but the clinical skin evidence is primarily from Types I and III.
Marine vs bovine: honest comparison
Both marine and bovine collagen are predominantly Type I and have produced positive skin results in RCTs. Marine collagen peptides tend to have a smaller average molecular weight (approximately 500 Da compared to 2,000 to 5,000 Da for most bovine products), which may favor intestinal absorption. The Inoue 2018 study showing significant skin benefits at just 1g per day used fish collagen, which is consistent with higher per-gram bioavailability.2 Bovine collagen has a larger overall evidence base and larger trial sizes. For strictly skin outcomes, neither is clearly superior. Personal, dietary, and ethical considerations (pescatarian, halal, kosher) reasonably drive the choice.
Related reading: the full collagen peptides guide covers sourcing, quality markers, and dosing strategy in greater depth.
09Frequently asked questions
For the specific outcomes of skin elasticity and hydration, yes: multiple double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs report significant improvements at doses of 2.5g to 10g per day over 8 to 12 weeks. Wrinkle depth also showed measurable reduction in several trials. The honest qualification is that most trials enrolled primarily female participants, sample sizes were modest, and several were industry-funded. The biological mechanism is plausible and increasingly well-understood via pharmacokinetic studies detecting absorbed peptides in skin tissue. The overall picture is credible, not hyped, but also not pharmaceutical-grade certainty.
Most clinical trials measuring skin outcomes ran 8 to 12 weeks. Improved hydration is typically measurable at 4 weeks. Elasticity improvements are documented at 8 weeks. Wrinkle depth changes generally require 10 to 12 weeks to reach significance. The Asserin 2015 study found that hydration benefits persisted for 12 weeks after the supplementation period ended, which suggests the effect is not purely temporary surface moisture. Expect a minimum of 8 weeks of daily use before evaluating whether it is working for you.
The most-studied dose range for skin outcomes is 2.5g to 10g per day. The Proksch 2014 study showed significant elasticity improvement at 2.5g, with no significant additional benefit at 5g, suggesting a saturation effect exists at low doses for that outcome. Marine collagen may work at even lower doses: the Inoue 2018 study showed meaningful skin benefits at 1g per day of fish collagen peptides, which is consistent with higher per-gram bioavailability. There is no strong evidence that exceeding 10g per day meaningfully improves skin outcomes beyond lower doses. Taking collagen with vitamin C (at least 50mg, ideally 100mg+) supports collagen synthesis as vitamin C is a required enzymatic cofactor.
For skin outcomes specifically, Types I and III are the relevant types because those make up roughly 90% of dermal collagen. Both bovine and marine collagen supplements typically provide Types I and III. Type II is the cartilage collagen, relevant for joint health but not a primary driver of skin outcomes. Multi-source products covering Type II alongside Types I and III are appropriate if joint and connective tissue support is also a goal, but they do not meaningfully improve skin outcomes beyond what Types I and III achieve. Marketing claims implying that more collagen types equals better skin results are not supported by clinical evidence for skin specifically.
Both are predominantly Type I collagen and both have produced positive skin results in RCTs. Marine collagen peptides tend to have a smaller average molecular weight, which may improve intestinal absorption, and the Inoue 2018 RCT achieved significant skin benefits at just 1g per day of fish collagen. Bovine collagen has a larger body of clinical evidence overall and larger individual trial sizes. For skin outcomes, neither is clearly superior. Dietary considerations including halal or kosher requirements, pescatarian preferences, or allergy concerns reasonably drive the choice. If you can tolerate both, you are not making a meaningfully wrong decision either way.
For supporting skin structure and elasticity, oral collagen supplements have a clearer evidence base than topical collagen. Full collagen protein is too large (around 300,000 Da) to penetrate the stratum corneum, so topical collagen creams provide surface moisturization rather than dermal structural support. Oral hydrolyzed collagen peptides, once absorbed and circulated, have been detected in skin tissue and shown to stimulate procollagen I production in fibroblasts in biopsy studies. Topical small-molecule peptides like GHK-Cu (around 340 Da) work via a distinct penetration pathway and are a complementary approach, not a substitute. The most complete skin strategy uses both oral and topical actives targeting the dermis from both directions. Our GHK-Cu looksmaxxing guide covers the topical side of this.
There is no meaningful RCT evidence that oral collagen supplements help with acne or inflammatory skin conditions. Acne is driven by sebum production, bacterial colonization, and immune-mediated inflammation in the follicle, not by collagen deficit. Skin inflammation research focuses on different ingredients: zinc has the best acne-specific RCT evidence among supplements; omega-3 fatty acids have supporting data for inflammatory skin; vitamin D deficiency is associated with skin inflammatory conditions in observational studies. Collagen supplements are specifically indicated for skin elasticity, hydration, and structural aging, not for sebaceous or inflammatory concerns. Confusing these separate domains is a common marketing blur worth being aware of.
For skin-specific use: (1) hydrolyzed collagen peptides (not whole collagen), so the peptides are pre-digested for absorption; (2) Types I and III from bovine or marine sources; (3) a dose in the 2.5g to 10g range per day; (4) vitamin C included or a clear plan to take it separately as a cofactor; (5) ideally a named bioactive fraction (PEPTAN, VERISOL, FORTIGEL) that has dedicated clinical research behind it, rather than generic commodity collagen where you cannot verify peptide molecular weight distribution. Certificate of analysis from third-party testing (NSF, Informed Sport, USP) confirms you are getting what the label says. Browse the MAXXING collagen peptides page for our formulation details, and the GymMaxxing collection for the full supplement range.
Oral collagen peptides and hormone replacement therapy work through entirely different pathways and there are no known interactions. Estrogen supports skin collagen synthesis directly, so HRT can help maintain dermal collagen density. Collagen supplementation supports collagen production from the fibroblast side. The two approaches are complementary, not competing. If you are on any prescribed hormone therapy, confirm with your prescribing doctor before adding any supplement, as this is general information and not personal medical advice.
// Sources & references
- Proksch E, et al. "Oral supplementation of specific collagen peptides has beneficial effects on human skin physiology: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study." Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;27(1):47-55. doi:10.1159/000351376
- Inoue N, et al. "Dietary collagen peptides improve skin hydration, elasticity and wrinkles in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial." Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1431. doi:10.3390/nu10091431
- Shoulders MD, Raines RT. "Collagen structure and stability." Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:929-958. PubMed 19344236
- El-Domyati M, et al. "Intrinsic aging vs. photoaging: a comparative histopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of skin." Exp Dermatol. 2002;11(5):398-405. PubMed 12366692
- Iwai K, et al. "Identification of food-derived collagen peptides in human blood after oral ingestion of gelatin hydrolysates." J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(16):6531-6536. PubMed 16076145
- Asserin J, et al. "The effect of oral collagen peptide supplementation on skin moisture and the dermal collagen network: evidence from an ex vivo model and randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials." J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015;14(4):291-301. doi:10.1111/jocd.12174
- Pullar JM, Carr AC, Vissers MCM. "The roles of vitamin C in skin health." Nutrients. 2017;9(8):866. doi:10.3390/nu9080866
- Shaw G, et al. "Vitamin C-enriched gelatin supplementation before intermittent activity augments collagen synthesis." Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(1):136-143. doi:10.3945/ajcn.116.138594
- Bolke L, et al. "A collagen supplement improves skin hydration, elasticity, roughness, and density: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, blind study." Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2494. doi:10.3390/nu11102494
- Oesser S, et al. "Oral administration of C-14 labeled gelatin hydrolysate leads to an accumulation of radioactivity in cartilage of mice." J Nutr. 1999;129(10):1891-1895. PubMed 10498764
- Watanabe-Kamiyama M, et al. "Absorption and effectiveness of orally administered low molecular weight collagen hydrolysate in rats." J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(2):835-841. PubMed 19957932
- Kim DU, et al. "Oral intake of low-molecular-weight collagen peptide improves hydration, elasticity, and wrinkling in human skin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study." Nutrients. 2018;10(7):826. doi:10.3390/nu10070826
- Zague V. "A new view concerning the effects of collagen hydrolysate intake on skin properties." Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300(9):479-483. PubMed 18389260
- de Miranda RB, et al. "Effects of hydrolyzed collagen supplementation on skin aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Int J Dermatol. 2021;60(12):1449-1461. PubMed 33742704
- Paul C, et al. "Significant amounts of functional collagen peptides can be incorporated in the diet while maintaining indispensable amino acid balance." Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1079. doi:10.3390/nu11051079
