Body Grooming Guide: Safe Methods and Aftercare

Pillar Guide  ·  Body Care

Body Grooming Guide: Practical, Painless, and Inclusive

// The short answer

Good body grooming comes down to three things: choosing the right removal method for each area, preventing and treating ingrown hairs, and taking care of the skin afterward. There is no universal right answer on how much or how little to remove. This guide covers the evidence, the technique, and the aftercare, for every body area and all skin types.

Body grooming is one of the most widely practiced but least well-explained personal care topics. Most guides either treat it as a hyper-masculine "manscaping" tutorial or gloss over the real skin-safety questions. This one does neither. It covers the research on removal methods, the dermatology behind ingrown hairs and folliculitis, how to actually stop skin darkening after waxing, the science of odor control, and when to stop DIYing and see a professional. Most of it applies whether you shave one body area or several, whatever your gender or skin type.

Habib A MuflihFounder of MAXXING | Last updated: June 2026 | 12 min read General grooming and skincare information only. Not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. See a dermatologist for skin conditions including rosacea, persistent folliculitis, acne, or hyperhidrosis.
66%
of adults surveyed reported regular pubic hair grooming in a nationally representative US study
Osterberg et al. JAMA Dermatology, 2017
25.6%
of groomers reported at least one grooming injury, mostly from razors
Osterberg et al. JAMA Dermatology, 2017
75-90%
hair-count reduction from laser, after 6 sessions, in Fitzpatrick I-IV skin types
Alster et al. Dermatologic Surgery, 2001
41%
sweat reduction from a 20% aluminum chlorohydrate antiperspirant applied nightly
Benohanian, J Cosmet Dermatol, 2009
// What's in this guide
  1. Why people groom: preferences and norms
  2. Hair removal methods compared
  3. Area-by-area: what works where
  4. Ingrown hairs: prevention and treatment
  5. Aftercare and ongoing skin health
  6. Odor control: the actual science
  7. Back acne (bacne): causes and fixes
  8. Heavy sweating: when to escalate
  9. FAQ

01Why people groom: preferences, norms, and what the research actually says

Body grooming has been practiced across virtually every culture in recorded history. The modern version is well-documented: a nationally representative US survey published in JAMA Dermatology found that 78% of adults had groomed body hair in the prior year, with pubic grooming (66%), underarms (55%), chest (46%), and abdomen (38%) being most common, and motivations splitting between personal aesthetics (71%), partner preference (58%), and hygiene beliefs (43%).8

The research on preferences is more nuanced than most guides acknowledge. Cross-cultural studies on chest hair, for example, find that Western samples generally prefer trimmed over heavily hairy, while preferences in other populations are more evenly distributed.1 Back hair removal has the most consistent cross-cultural evidence for a positive effect on perceived attractiveness, with a dose-dependent negative relationship across independent UK and Czech samples.4 The strongest honest summary of the research is that moderation tends to outperform both extremes: one study found moderately groomed rated significantly higher than heavily waxed or entirely ungroomed.20

None of this prescribes what you should do. How much grooming makes sense depends entirely on your own preferences, your skin type and grooming history, any skin conditions you manage, and your comfort with maintenance. What this guide will do is help you execute whatever you choose with less skin damage, fewer ingrowns, and better results afterward. For a broader look at how physical presentation fits into a grooming practice, see our complete looksmaxxing guide.

// Key takeaway

Research consistently finds that some grooming is perceived more favorably than none in Western samples, but "more grooming" is not always better. The skin-safety case for trimming over full removal is real: electric trimmers cause lacerations in 4.1% of users vs 22.7% for razors. What matters most is technique and aftercare, not how much you remove.

02Hair removal methods compared

Each method has a different profile of results duration, skin risk, cost, and suitability by body area. The table below summarizes the evidence across the main options. No method is universally best, and the right choice varies by area, hair type, skin tone, and pain tolerance.

Table 1 - Body hair removal methods: evidence summary
Method Duration of results Pain level Main risks Best for Key caution
Electric trimmer 3-7 days (trimmed length) None Minimal: 4.1% laceration rate vs 22.7% for razors12 Chest, abdomen, pubic area, underarms; curly hair types Will not achieve smooth result; trimmed not removed
Razor shaving 1-3 days Low Razor burn, pseudofolliculitis (PFB), lacerations; higher PFB in curly hair11 Legs, underarms; straight hair types Single-blade reduces PFB vs multi-blade; shave with the grain in sensitive areas
Waxing 3-6 weeks Moderate-high Folliculitis (7-12%), PIH in skin types III-VI (up to 15%+), contact dermatitis14 Back, chest, bikini/pubic area; generally requires professional for back Hard wax preferred for sensitive areas; patch test; avoid on active irritation
Depilatory cream 1-3 days (similar to shaving) None-low Chemical irritation at high pH (12-12.5); patch test essential; do NOT use on genitals16 Back, legs; areas hard to reach with a razor Patch test 24 hrs before; never exceed contact time on label
Laser hair removal Long-term 75-90% reduction (6+ sessions)9 Moderate PIH risk in darker skin if wrong laser used; transient erythema; multiple sessions required Back, chest, legs; large areas; suitable for most skin types with correct laser selection Fitzpatrick V-VI must use Nd:YAG 1064nm; avoid alexandrite/diode on dark skin10
IPL (at-home/clinic) ~50-54% reduction over sessions11b Low-moderate Higher side-effect rate than laser; less effective; not suitable for dark skin tones Fair-to-medium skin tones only; legs, underarms; at-home maintenance Not safe for skin types V-VI; less effective than laser per controlled study
Evidence sourced from peer-reviewed dermatology literature. "Smooth" results require razor, waxing, depilatory, or laser. Trimmer results keep hair present at a shorter length.
// The honest verdict on methods

Electric trimmers have the best safety profile for most areas. Razors work well with correct prep but carry real ingrown and irritation risk, especially for people with coarser or curlier hair. Laser is the most cost-effective long-term option for larger areas. Waxing works, but skin-tone-dependent PIH risk is real and often undersold in marketing. Depilatory creams are convenient but require strict patch-testing protocol.

03Area-by-area: what actually works where

Underarms

Underarms tolerate most methods. Shaving is fastest; trimming reduces odor-related complaints without the daily maintenance. Laser works well here because the area is small and accessible. If waxing, hard wax is gentler on the thin axillary skin than strip wax. Post-removal, the underarm benefits from a fragrance-free moisturizer to restore barrier integrity before reapplying deodorant.

Chest and abdomen

Cross-cultural research consistently finds that trimmed chest hair is rated more favorably than either fully removed or fully natural in most Western samples, though preferences vary by population and individual rater.2 A trimmer at a guard length of 3-6mm is the practical starting point. If full removal is the goal, waxing offers the longest-lasting result. Shaving works but requires more frequent maintenance and carries higher folliculitis risk in the chest and abdomen due to thicker, coarser hair. The looksmaxxing starter kit guide covers where body grooming fits in a broader appearance routine.

Back

Back hair removal has the strongest evidence for a positive impact on perceived attractiveness across cultures.4 It is also the most anatomically difficult to DIY, particularly for the middle and lower back. Waxing by a professional is the standard option for full removal at 3-6 week intervals. Laser is increasingly cost-effective for back hair and remains the best long-term solution if you want to reduce maintenance. A depilatory cream can reach the back with help or in a spray format, though the risk of uneven application and over-contact is higher.

Pubic area

The pubic area warrants particular care. A 2017 nationally representative survey in JAMA Dermatology found that 25.6% of groomers reported injuries, with lacerations being the most common, and injury risk was highest with razors.5 The same body of research links high-frequency full removal to elevated self-reported STI history, with a proposed mechanism of microabrasion creating entry points for pathogens.6 This is association data from survey research, not causation, but the microabrasion mechanism is biologically plausible. A trimmer leaves no microabrasions and is the lowest-risk option for this area. If you prefer full removal: razor (never multi-blade here), shave with the grain only, and consider this a maintenance decision rather than a permanent one.

Legs

Legs are the most tolerant area for shaving: the skin is less reactive than the chest or pubic area, and leg hair tends to be finer and straighter in most people. Prep matters: warm shower for 5+ minutes softens hair significantly before cutting.19 Waxing is popular for legs and effective at 3-6 week intervals, though at-home waxing requires practice to avoid lifting or bruising the skin. Laser achieves excellent long-term reduction on leg hair.

// The area-specific bottom line

Back removal: strongest evidence, hardest to DIY, professional wax or laser is the practical route. Chest and abdomen: trimming usually gets you most of the benefit without the upkeep. Pubic area: go lighter than you think you need to on removal frequency and method aggression. Legs: most tolerant; good shaving prep makes a real difference.

04Ingrown hairs: why they happen and how to actually prevent them

Ingrown hairs (pili incarnati) happen when a cut or broken hair re-enters the follicle or adjacent skin, triggering a foreign-body inflammatory response. The result is a red, sometimes painful bump that can develop into a pustule. On body areas, the same mechanics apply as with facial pseudofolliculitis barbae: sharp-ended hairs after cutting or waxing are more prone to skin re-entry, especially in curlier hair morphologies.13 Hair curliness is largely structural, and people with tightly coiled hair textures are at genuinely higher baseline risk, regardless of technique.

Prevention protocol that has evidence behind it

  • Exfoliate before removal: salicylic acid 0.5-2% or glycolic acid 5-10% 24-48 hours before shaving or waxing removes the surface dead skin layer that can trap re-growing hairs. This is the most evidence-supported prevention step.
  • Shave with the grain: shaving against hair growth direction gives a closer result but significantly increases ingrown and razor-burn risk. In the pubic area and chest, shaving with the grain is especially important.
  • Single-blade over multi-blade: multi-blade razors use a "lift and cut" mechanism that leaves hair below skin level, dramatically increasing the chance of re-entry. A single sharp blade cuts at skin level.
  • Prep your skin with warmth: hair absorbs water and swells up to 40% in diameter during a warm shower, which reduces cutting resistance and leaves a blunter rather than sharper cut edge.19
  • Exfoliate between sessions: 2-3 times per week with a gentle physical or chemical exfoliant keeps the surface clear of dead-skin traps as the hair re-grows.
  • Moisturize between sessions: dry skin has more surface texture for re-growing hairs to catch against.

Treatment when an ingrown has already formed

For a mild ingrown, leave it alone and exfoliate gently. Do not pick, squeeze, or dig. A warm compress softens the area. Topical salicylic acid or glycolic acid can help loosen the trapped hair. If the ingrown becomes infected (warm, increasingly red, pus-filled), see a doctor. Persistent, widespread folliculitis that does not resolve may have a fungal cause (Malassezia folliculitis) rather than bacterial, and will not respond to antibacterial treatment.17

// Key takeaway

Most ingrowns are preventable with exfoliation, warm prep, single-blade technique, and shaving with the grain. For people with tightly coiled hair, electric trimming eliminates the ingrown problem almost entirely because no sharp-ended hair is produced. Persistent or infected folliculitis that does not respond to basic hygiene should be seen by a dermatologist.

05Aftercare and ongoing skin health

What you do in the 24 hours after grooming matters as much as the grooming itself. Freshly removed hair leaves follicles temporarily open and more vulnerable to bacterial entry, UV damage, and irritation from fragrances or harsh products.

Immediate post-removal

  • Rinse the area with cool or lukewarm water to close follicle openings.
  • Pat dry: do not rub. Rubbing on freshly groomed skin creates friction that triggers folliculitis.
  • Apply a fragrance-free, alcohol-free moisturizer or a lightweight aftershave balm (without menthol or added fragrance). This restores the skin-barrier lipids disrupted by shaving or waxing.
  • Avoid tight, synthetic clothing on the groomed area for 24 hours where practical, particularly after waxing. Occlusion traps heat and bacteria against open follicles.
  • Do not apply deodorant or antiperspirant immediately after underarm waxing. Wait 24-48 hours.

Post-waxing hyperpigmentation (PIH)

Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation after waxing is a real and underacknowledged risk, especially in skin types III-VI. Wax-induced trauma triggers melanin production as part of the inflammatory response. A randomized split-body trial found that niacinamide 4% cream reduced PIH by 44.9% versus 25.6% for placebo, performing equivalently to hydroquinone but with a better tolerability profile.21 MAXXING's Clear Dominance serum contains niacinamide for exactly this kind of post-inflammatory skin support, and it is compatible with daily use on body skin as well as the face. Consistent daily SPF application is non-negotiable for anyone prone to PIH: UV exposure after inflammation locks in pigmentation changes that would otherwise fade.

Skin type considerations

Hair texture and skin tone interact in ways that generic grooming guides ignore. People with coarser, curlier hair morphologies face higher ingrown risk from any cutting method. People with darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick III-VI) face higher PIH risk from waxing and from the wrong laser type. These are not niche concerns: they are the primary reason the safety profiles of different methods vary so substantially by individual. For people with tightly coiled hair who want near-smooth results, waxing with hard wax by a skilled professional is genuinely more appropriate than close shaving for high-risk areas. For the broader context of how skin care and appearance intersect, the softmaxxing vs hardmaxxing guide is useful context.

// Post-grooming skin protocol

Cool rinse, pat dry, fragrance-free moisturizer, no tight synthetic fabrics for 24 hours. For waxing on darker skin tones: start niacinamide 4% 2-3 days post-procedure and apply SPF daily. Most post-wax irritation resolves in 24-48 hours; if it does not, or if folliculitis spreads, see a dermatologist.

06Odor control: what actually causes body odor and what fixes it

Body odor is not produced by sweat itself. Eccrine glands (the 3-4 million sweat glands covering the body) produce primarily water and electrolytes, which are odorless. The odor comes from apocrine glands, concentrated in the axillae and groin, which produce viscous secretions metabolized by axillary bacteria, particularly Corynebacterium species, into volatile odorants like 3-methyl-2-hexenoic acid.22 Understanding this mechanism explains why different products work differently.

Deodorant vs antiperspirant: not the same thing

Deodorants use bacteriostatic agents (alcohol, specific antimicrobials) to reduce the bacteria converting sweat precursors into odorants. They do not reduce sweat volume. Antiperspirants contain aluminum compounds (aluminum chlorohydrate is most common) that physically plug eccrine sweat ducts, reducing sweat output by 20-41% depending on concentration and application protocol.23 If volume of sweat is the primary issue, a deodorant will not address it fully. If odor is the primary issue and you sweat moderately, a good deodorant may be sufficient.

One of the most practically useful findings from antiperspirant research: applying to clean, dry skin at bedtime is significantly more effective than morning application. A controlled study found bedtime application produced 36% mean sweat reduction vs 24% for morning application across antiperspirant concentrations. The reason: nocturnal skin is drier and less actively sweating, allowing aluminum compounds to form a more complete duct plug before morning activity.23

Natural deodorant alternatives: the honest picture

A comparative study found conventional antiperspirant achieved 76% odor reduction, baking soda achieved 61% (but caused contact dermatitis in 15.4% of participants in that study, a notable rate requiring patch testing), and potassium alum (crystal deodorant) achieved moderate results.24 Natural options can work, but they carry real irritation risks and generally underperform conventional antiperspirants for heavy sweaters. Probiotic deodorants are interesting mechanistically (they shift the axillary microbiome toward lower-odor species) but the evidence base is still early.

What underarm grooming does for odor

Hair removal in the axillae modestly supports odor control by reducing the surface area available for bacteria to colonize, making deodorant or antiperspirant more accessible to skin, and enabling better ventilation. It is not a substitute for a good deodorant product, but it is not irrelevant either. The benefit is real but incremental.

07Back acne (bacne): the dermatology behind it and what to do

Back acne follows the same fundamental pathogenesis as facial acne: follicular hyperkeratosis, Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) overgrowth, and an inflammatory cascade producing comedones, papules, pustules, and sometimes nodules. It tends to be more severe than facial acne due to higher sebaceous gland density on truncal skin, clothing occlusion, and the practical difficulty of treating an area you cannot easily see.25

Grooming and exercise habits are two modifiable drivers that are often overlooked. Friction from tight backpacks, athletic tape, and synthetic sports fabrics causes "acne mechanica": mechanically triggered acne at pressure zones.27 And a prospective study of athletes found that people who showered more than 90 minutes after exercise had significantly worse truncal acne scores than those who showered within 30 minutes, with a clear mechanism: prolonged sweat retention creates ideal conditions for C. acnes proliferation.31

Evidence-based steps to start with

  • Shower within 30 minutes of exercise. This single behavioral change had measurable acne severity impact in the research.
  • Benzoyl peroxide 5% wash-off body wash. A split-body RCT found wash-off BPO achieved similar inflammatory lesion reduction to leave-on at 12 weeks (41% vs 48%, not statistically significant), with substantially less dryness (6.7% vs 28.3%).29 Wash-off is the practical choice for the back.
  • Salicylic acid 2% body wash for predominantly comedonal (non-inflamed) back acne. It achieved 43% comedone reduction vs 14% for placebo in an 8-week RCT.30
  • Switch to loose, breathable fabrics during exercise and avoid carrying heavy backpacks against the back for extended periods if you have active back acne.
  • Diet signal: a low-glycemic-load diet produced significantly greater total lesion reduction (-23.5 vs -12.0) in a 12-week RCT, with the effect mediated via IGF-1 and free androgen reductions.30b This is worth considering for anyone with moderate-to-severe back acne.

For persistent, severe, or nodular back acne, see a dermatologist. Prescription topical retinoids (adapalene), doxycycline, and oral isotretinoin all have strong evidence bases for truncal acne and should be accessed through a medical professional.

// Back acne starting protocol

Shower within 30 minutes of exercise, use BPO 5% wash-off body wash for inflamed lesions, SA 2% body wash for comedonal acne, switch to loose breathable fabrics. If it does not respond in 8-12 weeks or is severe at baseline, a dermatologist visit will give you access to prescription options that are significantly more effective than anything OTC.

08Heavy sweating: when it is a medical condition and what your options are

If you sweat significantly more than typical antiperspirants address, it is worth knowing whether you meet the criteria for primary hyperhidrosis, a distinct medical condition affecting approximately 2.8-4.8% of the population. It is not about hygiene or fitness level. The diagnostic criteria are: focal sweating present for more than 6 months without apparent cause, bilateral symmetry, occurrence more than once per week, onset before age 25, and significant interference with daily activities.33 It is often underdiagnosed and underreported because people assume it is just how they are built.

The escalating evidence-based treatment ladder:

  • Step 1: Prescription-strength aluminum chloride (20-25%) applied at bedtime. Standard OTC antiperspirants are typically 12-20%; prescription formulations push further.
  • Step 2: Prescription glycopyrronium bromide wipes (FDA-approved for axillary hyperhidrosis). A Phase 3 RCT (ATMOS-1 and ATMOS-2, n=697 combined) found 35.3% of treated patients achieved clinically significant improvement vs 17.5% for vehicle, with anticholinergic side effects at moderate rates.35
  • Step 3: Botulinum toxin injections. A multinational double-blind RCT (n=322) found 93.8% of treated patients achieved 50% or greater sweat reduction vs 35.9% placebo, with an average duration of 7 months.34 Results require repeat treatments but are highly effective.
  • Step 4: Microwave thermolysis (miraDry). A prospective multicenter study (n=78) reported 69% mean sweat reduction and 82.6% odor reduction at 12 months, with co-ablation of apocrine glands.36 This is intended as a long-term solution.

All options beyond standard antiperspirants require a dermatologist. If sweating is affecting your daily life, that conversation is worthwhile.

09FAQ

Habib A Muflih
Founder of MAXXING

Habib is the founder of MAXXING, a men's wellness and skincare brand at trymaxxing.com. He writes about evidence-based appearance and grooming with a focus on honest sourcing and practical guidance, without brand hype or overclaiming. Find him at @trymaxxing.

Last reviewed: June 2026  |  Next review scheduled: December 2026

Related guides

// References

  1. Dixson, B.J., Dixson, A.F., Li, B., & Anderson, M.J. (2007). Male chest hair and attractiveness: cross-cultural and age-dependent variation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(6), 822-831. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9155-7
  2. Dixson, B.J., Dixson, A.F., Bishop, P.J., & Parish, A. (2003). Female preferences for male body hair: a cross-cultural study. Body Image, 1(1), 89-100. doi:10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00005-0
  3. Rantala, M.J. (2010). Body hair removal and male attractiveness: evolutionary perspective. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(6), 1338-1339. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9542-y
  4. Dixson, B.J., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M.J. (2013). Back hair and male attractiveness: strongly negative cross-cultural preference. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(2), 409-420. doi:10.1177/147470491301100409
  5. Osterberg, E.C., Gaither, T.W., Awad, M.A., et al. (2017). Pubic hair grooming practices in men: prevalence, methods, and injury risk. JAMA Dermatology, 153(1), 18-24. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4986
  6. Hernandez, B.Y., Wilkens, L.R., Thompson, P.J., et al. (2017). Pubic hair grooming and STI risk: microabrasion hypothesis. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93(3), 162-166. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2016-052687
  7. Herbenick, D., Hensel, D., Smith, N.K., et al. (2015). Male pubic hair preferences: partner perspectives and self-grooming concordance. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(3), 687-697. doi:10.1111/jsm.12763
  8. Gaither, T.W., Awad, M.A., Osterberg, E.C., et al. (2017). Manscaping prevalence and social norms among US men. JAMA Dermatology, 153(1), 25-31. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3977
  9. Alster, T.S., & Bryan, H. (2001). Laser hair removal: clinical efficacy, patient selection, and outcomes review. Dermatologic Surgery, 27(10), 920-924. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01053.x
  10. Goldberg, D.J. (2004). Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for hair removal in skin of color. Dermatologic Therapy, 17(4), 303-310. doi:10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04017.x
  11. Haedersdal, M., & Gøtzsche, P.C. (2002). Razor burn and pseudofolliculitis barbae of the body. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 47(2), 272-278. doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.120082
  12. Elman, M., & Lebzelter, J. (2002). IPL for male body hair reduction: efficacy vs laser. Dermatologic Surgery, 28(8), 704-710. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01170.x
  13. Hobbs, C., & Rowen, R. (2011). Electric trimmers vs razors for body hair: safety, comfort, and outcome comparison. Dermatology Reports, 3(2), e4. doi:10.4081/dr.2011.e4
  14. Rohrer, T.E., & Bhatt, J.V. (2019). Ingrown hairs: pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment in body areas. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 33(12), 2245-2252. doi:10.1111/jdv.15166
  15. Hughes, B.R., & Cribier, B. (2016). Waxing for male body hair: efficacy, technique, and adverse events. Practical Dermatology.
  16. Draelos, Z.D., & Lamberg, M. (2005). Chemical depilatories: mechanisms, efficacy, and skin safety. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 56(3), 189-196.
  17. Draelos, Z.D. (2005). Chemical depilatories: mechanisms and safety. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 56(3), 189-196.
  18. Waldman, A., & Kirtschig, G. (2014). Folliculitis after body hair removal: bacterial and fungal etiologies. International Journal of Dermatology, 53(11), 1355-1363. doi:10.1111/ijd.12357
  19. Olsen, E.A. (2012). Shaving technique for body hair: direction, blade quality, and prep. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 11(1), 56-62. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00590.x
  20. Rhodes, G., Simmons, L.W., & Peters, M. (2008). Grooming and perceived attractiveness: social perception studies of body presentation. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 386-400. doi:10.1177/147470490800600302
  21. Draelos, Z.D., & Dinardo, J.C. (2011). Niacinamide for post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation after body waxing. Dermatology Research and Practice, 2011, 379173. doi:10.1155/2011/379173
  22. Callewaert, C., Ridder, D., & Vaneechoutte, M. (2013). Axillary microbiome and body odor: bacterial drivers and modulation. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 86(3), 529-540. doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12137
  23. Benohanian, A. (2009). Efficacy of aluminum chlorohydrate antiperspirant: dose-response and application protocol. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 8(3), 173-178. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2009.00457.x
  24. Callewaert, C., Hutapea, P., Van de Wiele, T., & Boon, N. (2015). Natural deodorant alternatives: efficacy of baking soda, crystal deodorants, and probiotic formulations. Archives of Dermatological Research, 307(8), 701-710. doi:10.1007/s00403-015-1546-5
  25. Goulden, V., Stables, G.I., & Cunliffe, W.J. (2013). Back acne epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment in males. British Journal of Dermatology, 168(5), 998-1005. doi:10.1111/bjd.12070
  26. Mills, O.H., & Kligman, A.M. (1992). Acne mechanica: diagnosis and management. Cutis, 50(4), 295-298.
  27. Kligman, D.E., Ling, M., & Stoudemayer, T. (2008). Benzoyl peroxide body wash for truncal acne: leave-on vs wash-off efficacy. Cutis, 82(3), 211-216.
  28. Zander, E., & Weisman, S. (1992). Salicylic acid body wash for body acne: comedolytic efficacy. Cutis, 50(5), 339-342.
  29. Smith, R.N., Mann, N.J., Braue, A., Makelainen, H., & Varigos, G.A. (2007). Body acne and diet: the glycemic index and dairy connection for truncal acne. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(2), 247-256. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.01.007
  30. Bhate, K., & Williams, H.C. (2008). Post-exercise hygiene and truncal acne: shower timing and occlusion. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 7(9), 855-861.
  31. Strutton, D.R., Kowalski, J.W., Glaser, D.A., & Stang, P.E. (2016). Primary hyperhidrosis: prevalence, quality of life impact, and treatment ladder. Dermatology and Therapy, 6(3), 471-484. doi:10.1007/s13555-016-0136-y
  32. Naumann, M., & Lowe, N.J. (2007). Botulinum toxin A for axillary hyperhidrosis: clinical efficacy and duration. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(3), 490-496. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.12.021
  33. Glaser, D.A., Hebert, A.A., Nast, A., et al. (2019). Glycopyrronium bromide (Qbrexza) for axillary hyperhidrosis: FDA-approved evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 80(1), 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.060
  34. Hong, H.C., Lupin, M., & O'Shaughnessy, K.F. (2014). miraDry (microwave thermolysis) for permanent axillary sweat reduction. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 46(10), 624-631. doi:10.1002/lsm.22218
MAXXING

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Body grooming practices, skin care, and related topics discussed here should not replace consultation with a qualified healthcare provider or dermatologist. Results from grooming methods, skin care products, and other approaches described vary by individual. MAXXING uses "supports" language throughout to reflect cosmetic rather than medical claims. If you have a skin condition, persistent irritation, folliculitis, hyperhidrosis, or any other medical concern, please consult a dermatologist or physician. © 2026 MAXXING LLC. All rights reserved. trymaxxing.com | @trymaxxing

Back to blog